The tennis calendar is a hot topic among players, with many feeling it’s too packed.
For years, both ATP and WTA seasons have been lengthy, but recently, voices like Iga Swiatek and Carlos Alcaraz have highlighted the pressure of this intense schedule. Alexander Zverev was quite outspoken at the Laver Cup, stating that the ATP prioritizes profits over player well-being.
Jannik Sinner offered a more balanced view. He acknowledged the long season and mandatory events but pointed out that players can choose their schedules and aren’t obligated to participate in every tournament .
| Name | Age | Points | Stats 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Holger Rune | 21 | 2,540 | 22 - 12 |
Player Perspectives on the Tennis Calendar:
Sinner, Rune, Djokovic, Nadal, Alcaraz, and Medvedev are all participating in the Six Kings Slam in Saudi Arabia. The fact that they can still find time for exhibition matches adds another layer to this debate. Fans might wonder if these exhibitions are truly necessary or just an added burden.
Known for his fiery spirit on court, Rune often struggles to keep his emotions in check during matches. However, when discussing the tennis calendar with Quindici Zero, he showed a thoughtful side. While he praised how well-organized the tour is—”We don’t play Mexico one week and Germany next”—he expressed dislike for two-week Masters 1000 events.
Rune believes exhibitions shouldn’t be seen as threats but rather as sources of inspiration for ATP to explore new ideas without risks. “As for exhibitions,” he said, “it’s good to have choices.” They offer a relaxed atmosphere where players can try new things without worrying about ranking points.
His comments stand out as more constructive compared to Zverev’s sharp criticism of ATP’s priorities. Perhaps engaging positively with governing bodies could lead to better solutions regarding scheduling concerns.
What do you think? Should players have more say in their schedules or is it just part of being a pro athlete?
