Jannik Sinner recently shared his thoughts on the tennis schedule, sparking a bit of controversy. While some players have been vocal about the demanding calendar, Sinner seemed less concerned.
Many ATP and WTA players have voiced their frustrations this year. Iga Swiatek has been particularly outspoken, warning that the intense schedule could lead to injuries. Alexander Zverev went as far as accusing the governing body of ignoring player welfare for profit.
Carlos Alcaraz and Taylor Fritz also think the season is too long. Fritz even admitted feeling pretty awful due to its length . But unlike them, Sinner took a more relaxed stance, suggesting players can choose which tournaments to play in.
| Name | Age | Points | Stats 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| it Jannik Sinner | 23 | 15,405 | 33 - 3 |
Reactions to Sinner’s Comments:
Not everyone agreed with Sinner’s view. Ugo Humbert felt it was easier for someone like him, at the top of the rankings, to skip events. Paul Annacone, who once coached Federer and Sampras, also disagreed with Sinner’s take on scheduling.
Fans might wonder why such a simple idea is so complicated for others. Annacone explained that while top players can afford to miss tournaments, lower-ranked ones face tougher choices due to commitments like sponsorships and team obligations.
“I loved hearing Jannik say there’s too much tennis,” Annacone commented. “But it’s not just about choosing not to play.” He highlighted how complex it is for many players who aren’t at the top level.
Annacone knows from experience that managing schedules isn’t easy for those not in elite positions. Some argue shortening the season could help these players avoid burnout from constant competition.
Sinner didn’t seem to consider this perspective in his remarks, which might explain why Humbert and Annacone reacted strongly. What do you think? Should tennis seasons be shorter or stay as they are?
